Why You Should Be Getting Paid for Your Data | NYT Opinion

Share
HTML-code

Comments • 279

  • S AVANT
    S AVANT  56 minutes back

    Again, Andrew Yang is ahead of our times and seeing this as a real issue. #YANG2020

    • John Champagne
      John Champagne  7 hours back

      The idea that a small family COULD earn $20,000/yr from the value of their data pertains to families that earn many tens of thousands of dollars per year. Not to families that earn $22,000/yr.

      I think paying for services we use is a better model. (I pay YouTube, rather than watch ads.) I agree that we should own our data. But I don't much care for the idea that we will still be advertised at, but we will get a check as the manager of our own personal advertising account  (The idea that our data is valuable only makes sense if it is being used in marketing campaigns.)

      Compare the estimated value of data (for some families) with the estimated value of natural wealth [$100/day per person, for everyone on Earth (not just for the affluent)]. (Robert Costanza, et al; Nature; 2014)

      We should make industries pay fees when they put pollution, deplete resources or destroy wildlife habitat. If random polls show that most people think there's not too much of this or that kind of impact, then we will know that the associated fee is set at the right amount.

      Sharing fee proceeds to all people would end poverty throughout the world. (This should be a global policy. Natural wealth belongs to all. If it is applied only in some nations, industries would tend to flee to the more lax jurisdictions.)

      Letter to the Editor: What we don't learn from the news...
      https://gaiabrain.blogspot.com/2018/03/letter-to-editor-share-natural-wealth.html

      • Jacqueline Wernett
        Jacqueline Wernett  12 hours back

        Blessing from Jacova 11

        • Juliana Katz
          Juliana Katz  16 hours back

          Love this!

          • Daniel Cornelison
            Daniel Cornelison  17 hours back

            Youtube Andrew Yang!

            • Liza'sLucky5
              Liza'sLucky5  18 hours back

              So if AI will be able to do everything for humans, and human will have time for anything. There could be another creative renaissance around he corner?

              • Jacob Yahiayan
                Jacob Yahiayan  19 hours back

                It supports our Global Citizen News; New for the Human Race By the Human Race (data matric)

                • Kevin Lopez
                  Kevin Lopez  21 hours back

                  This is why we need Andrew Yang as president.

                  • James Moore
                    James Moore  1 days back

                    https://www.yang2020.com/policies/data-property-right/

                    Yang Gang

                    • Clayton Bennett
                      Clayton Bennett  2 days back

                      What do you mean that our future is being reduced?

                      • Clayton Bennett
                        Clayton Bennett  2 days back

                        This is kind of ironic. I now feel like I should get off YouTube.

                        • smy l
                          smy l  2 days back

                          This video gives the same message as what popular social media likes to have, the message that instills fear and anger. It just sounds like hype that hit the other cheek. Do better, NYT, I am disappointed.

                          • Rayn B
                            Rayn B  2 days back

                            #yanggang

                            • Pheon McBride
                              Pheon McBride  2 days back

                              These devices l'm so sure are listening. Certain discussions I've had with family... End up in my news feed or in pop-in ads.

                              • Paul Michel
                                Paul Michel  2 days back

                                VALUE, YES. MANIPULATION, NO!!

                                • Hey Buddy Guy Friend Pal

                                  Yang2020

                                  • Small Potatoes
                                    Small Potatoes  2 days back

                                    Well ain't it great that there's a candidate who has already thought about this: https://www.yang2020.com/policies/data-property-right/

                                    • Alex Linnenkohl
                                      Alex Linnenkohl  3 days back

                                      voice.com will fix this

                                      • Jeffrey Chiu
                                        Jeffrey Chiu  3 days back

                                        Freedom dividend and human capitalism is the best of both socialism and capitalism.

                                        • Ricky Berwick
                                          Ricky Berwick  3 days back

                                          Wow this is amazing. Data ownership is coming - eos - voice. com - Edna - own it

                                          • Jeffrey Chiu
                                            Jeffrey Chiu  3 days back

                                            #YoutubeAndrewYang

                                            • hello
                                              hello  3 days back

                                              Yang 2020!

                                              • Dallas Segno
                                                Dallas Segno  4 days back

                                                I already pay the internet company to use the internet you clown

                                                • Elons Musket
                                                  Elons Musket  4 days back

                                                  The Replacements, aka...the Replicants, the Robots, Androids, "the next race", etc...
                                                  .... will be built from OUR data.
                                                  Keep that in mind.

                                                  • Kantnklaar
                                                    Kantnklaar  4 days back

                                                    Yes make money the motivation behind social and economic decisions and behaviour! What could possibly go wrong. I mean it has been going swell until now with capitalism right? Right?

                                                    • Kantnklaar
                                                      Kantnklaar  4 days back

                                                      "Honeh, according to Google Trends this is the most lucrative moment to make a baby and keep a vlog on it!"

                                                  • Ekaterian Gaming
                                                    Ekaterian Gaming  5 days back

                                                    This needs so many more views wtf

                                                    • Post Oak
                                                      Post Oak  5 days back

                                                      You've really got your finger on the pulse. Amazing! Thank you.

                                                      • phillip st
                                                        phillip st  5 days back

                                                        wealth isn't created from generosity but greed and now i am charging anyone who reads this one hundred dollars ...you're lucky i didn't say billion ...money causes mouths to drool like rabies

                                                        • Roselight Cafe
                                                          Roselight Cafe  6 days back

                                                          Oooh sure hope you are right! Sounds like a plan… Now… How do you get it implemented…? Good luck and God speed❗️

                                                          • 1Ephraimite
                                                            1Ephraimite  2 days back

                                                            Andrew Yang is a Democratic presidential candidate who has a policy to make our data financially viable for us...the owners of said data. This is how we start, how far we can take it is entirely up to us.

                                                        • Dallas Segno
                                                          Dallas Segno  7 days back

                                                          one man's idea is always the solution for every person. I say, down with tech. ironically AND seriously. take my phone, I don't care.

                                                          • Dallas Segno
                                                            Dallas Segno  7 days back

                                                            Netflix sucks btw

                                                            • Andre Pop
                                                              Andre Pop  7 days back

                                                              Yep, Andrew Yang has my vote!

                                                              • Dallas Segno
                                                                Dallas Segno  7 days back

                                                                I just want to make sure I can still get paid for broadcasting murder. and I can still spend my money for murdering people after being released from jail.

                                                                • Sebastian Erazo
                                                                  Sebastian Erazo  1 weeks back

                                                                  He’s Post Malone’s ultimate evolution

                                                                  • J luke
                                                                    J luke  1 weeks back

                                                                    Conciousness is the currency. Remove your focus remove their power.

                                                                    • Redro Wollof T'nod
                                                                      Redro Wollof T'nod  1 weeks back

                                                                      Andrew Yang is not endored by Jaron Lanier. Jaron Lanier has said explicitly that he wishes Yang would stop misquoting him.

                                                                      • Geoff Burgess
                                                                        Geoff Burgess  2 weeks back

                                                                        I hope Lanier got paid for doing that!

                                                                        • Vac Efron
                                                                          Vac Efron  2 weeks back

                                                                          This is more communist propaganda!

                                                                          • beauties halloffame
                                                                            beauties halloffame  2 weeks back

                                                                            Governmental and private/newsmedia...

                                                                            IT'S TRUE, IT'S A COUP AGAINST THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (AND FREE WORLD), A CREATOR OF COUPS AROUND THE WORLD, BY BOTH SIDES...{RICO ACT VIOLATINGLY "TAKING/KEEPING THE MATTER FROM OUR/THE-GRAND-JURY'S
                                                                            SCRUTINY & JUSTICE, INSTEAD OF BRINGING IT TO THEM", ASAP, GRAND JURY, WITNESS, AND EVIDENCE TAMPERINGLY: PRODUCING CIVIL/WORLD WAR, INSTEAD OF RESOLVING IT, TRIALLY/PEACEFULLY].....UNTIL THESE "DEFICITS AND CORRUPTION ELIMINATING GRAND JURY AND EDUCATIONAL WARRANTS" ARE
                                                                            ENFORCED...WHEN IT TAKES "TWO YEARS" TO GET REPROVABLE-WRONGDOERS OUT OF OFFICE (OR REPROVABLY-DUE BENEFITS PAID), INSTEAD OF THE 10 DAYS, 15 MAXIMUM, OF PROPER GRAND JURY FUNCTION....A GOVERNMENT COUP IS OCCURRING/HAS-OCCURRED....{INCLUDING GETTING THESE WARRANTED GRAND JURY UPGRADES/CORRECTIVES, AT LEAST, PROVIDED TO OUR ALLIES FOR
                                                                            VOLUNTARY ENFORCEMENT/IMPLEMENTATION, TO PREVENT THEM FROM BEING
                                                                            COUP'D/LOOTED, AS THESE PEOPLE ARE DOING, BOTH SIDES, WHO FAIL/REFUSE TO ENFORCE THESE WARRANTS AT
                                                                            www.ScientifiGrandJuryHandbook.blogspot.com​ AND
                                                                            www.PRLog.Org/10439874]...UNTIL THE TRILLIONS/YEAR IN
                                                                            INSURANCE/BENEFITS PREVENTING CONSTITUTIONAL/GRAND-JURY DEFAULT FUNCTION IS WORKING PROPERLY (AS THE 1948-TITLE-22
                                                                            UNCHANGEABLY/SELF-REVISINGLY PROVIDED), A "CONSTITUTIONAL COUP: WILL BE OCCURRING...
                                                                            ______
                                                                            ______

                                                                            [LIKE THE HOUSE, THE SENATE CAN CONDUCT "TRIALS", BUT, THEY MUST
                                                                            FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF LAW TO DO SO...THE SENATE, CERTAINLY, HAS NOT FULFILLED THESE IMPARTIALITY REQUIREMENTS....
                                                                            W/DEFAULT-CONVICTIONS EXISTING, ESPECIALLY]...
                                                                            _______
                                                                            _______

                                                                            Proper "BENEFIT OF TRIAL BY JURY" Gfunction...GRAND JURY PRESENTMENTS OF CLAIMS/AFFIRMATIONS-OF-WRONGDOING and "non-negligent"
                                                                            determinations on LAW-FIRST, THEN
                                                                            FACTS...A1S7P1-3,A3S2P3,A6S1-3,5TH-AMENDMENT&USSTATUTE-1/24/1857..ALLOWING/"REQ'G"
                                                                            LOCAL GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT&DEFAULT...

                                                                            Though there may be cause/criminal-occupation-etc. to refrain from
                                                                            local GRAND JURY presentment, w/out such cause being
                                                                            asserted/tried/proven it's criminal negligence not to make such GRAND
                                                                            JURY presentments..including 25th Amendment mandates of their making
                                                                            reports/dec.in 4 days


                                                                            Prosecuting/trying/inducting/default-convicting them, officially, if/as needed...NEXT, ASSERTING, AS PER USSTATUTE-1/24/1857 DEFAULT
                                                                            BEING EXPLICITLY-PROVIDED, IT'S A FELONY NOT TO USE DEFAULT, AS
                                                                            POSSIBLE, A THEFT OF TAX/FRANKPENCE-PAID BENEFITS TO TRIAL BY JURY..A3S2P3..ETC..

                                                                            Realizing The House, the creators of the 1787 Bicameral Congress,merely maintained their oversight of OFFICE removal, to prevent abuse/mock-trials (punishment of innocents&non-punishment of guilties)...THE GRAND JURY TRIAL OF LAW REGARDING REMOVAL MUST CONCLUDE THAT IMPEACHMENT..

                                                                            ...I.E., IMPEACHMENT IS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROVIDED, EXPLICITLY, ONLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT ALLOWS AN EXCEPTION TO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND...IN THAT BELOW-BANKRUPTCY-PROPERTY, IF SUCH GOVERNMENT EMPLOY SHOULD BE SUCH, IS ALLOWED TO BE DISPOSSESSED UPON MERELY A CIVIL-VERDICT.

                                                                            Providing,therefore,that such potential dispossession of below bankruptcy property, for national security purposes, be limited exclusively to such GOVERNMENT OFFICE holdings, UPON mere-impeachment/civil-verdicts...&that only civil verdicts of the 2/3rds or greater majority apply

                                                                            Whereas,as per A2S4, convictions "automaticly-remove from office"(OR
                                                                            "impeach" for short, like all crimes including the lesser crimes of
                                                                            civil negligence&criminal negligence)... all else is fraudulent representation of the law, the U. S. Constitution, Supreme Law of the Land..

                                                                            The 1787 Congress,realizing false/colonial legislations/precedents
                                                                            still existed, maintained this oversight primarily to ensure that no such pretended authority legislations/adjudication were allowed to remove its members, w/out its ability to correct it reverse those
                                                                            decisions..

                                                                            Hence,impeachments occur (are due)for all civil infractions/violations
                                                                            of the 2/3rds or greater degree of certainty of wrongdoing,as well as
                                                                            for all criminal violations of the unanimous&beyond doubt degree of
                                                                            certainty,unless civil-indictments/convictions are pretended
                                                                            authority..

                                                                            Thusly,while removals/impeachment cannot occur for "speeding tickets
                                                                            proper", if/when the ticket/written-demand accused fails/refuses to
                                                                            preponderably answer of pay/comply with any such ticket/written-demand(grand jury presented,properly),in 10-15 days,
                                                                            they've engaged in default

                                                                            ...I.E., DEFAULT, AN ARRESTABLE, "SCIENTIFIC/REPROVABLE FELONY", AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE ACCUSER, AS WELL AS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (OATHS OF OFFICE INCLUDED)CIVIL&CRIMINAL
                                                                            NEGLIGENCE..MINIMALLY..&REMOVAL IS REQUIRED..[While Emergency
                                                                            circumstances may allow for

                                                                            ..may allow for the proof that the ticket was wrongly-cited/unjustified, the faiure/refusal to preponderably-answer/assert-such or pay/comply in 10-15 days is, still, a civilly&criminally negligent act that justifies
                                                                            automatic-removal/default-convictions, w/out further cause..

                                                                            ..hence, the rule of thumb in such cases is to pay the fine to prevent
                                                                            default&prove your medical disability, etc.prevented preponderably
                                                                            answer, later..THUS,THE PROPER APPLICATION OF DEFAULT IN TRAFFIC TICKETS,PROVIDES THE IMPEACHMENT LIMITS FOR "TICKET-DEFAULTS"&GREATER CRIMES

                                                                            Constitutionally "HIGH CRIMES & MISDEMEANORS", FOR REMOVAL, ENTAILING ALL SUCH CIVIL & CRIMINAL ACTS OF WRONGDOING TO THE 2/3RDS-CIVIL OR GREATER DEGREE...Where no pretended authority ACTS are asserted/proven...

                                                                            The law, regarding Removal from Office & its civil-impeachment-equivalent have, therefore been made...Now, as regards the due processes of implementation/enforcement thereof...As A1S7P1-3; A3S2P3;The 5th Amendment;&USSTATUTE-1/24/1857 provide....The benefit of trial by jury is...

                                                                            Constitutionally, THE TAX-PAID-BENEFIT OF TRIAL BY JURY IS,
                                                                            TRADITIONALLY, DIVIDED/"BIFURCATED" INTO "GRAND JURY, TRIAL JURY, SENTENCING JURY PHASES", a1S3P7, "INDICTMENT, TRIAL, JUDGEMENT&
                                                                            PUNISHMENT", GENERALLY PROVIDED..Thus, w/grand-jury-presentment of the 1857 Act,5th Amend.

                                                                            ..as A1S7P1-3,A3S2P3,A6,&THE 5TH AMENDMENT PROVIDE, not only may the "indictment phase" be concluded at the grand jury (preliminary benefits of trial by jury)but,when written-demands are used(criminally negligent not to use)default-convictions may be  accomplished at grand juries


                                                                            Hence, REMOVALS FROM OFFICE MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AT THIS
                                                                            FIRST/GRAND-JURY/"HISTORICLY-INDICTMENT" STAGE OF
                                                                            TAX-PAID/DUE PROCEEDINGS... eliminating all further costs for "mere
                                                                            removal"...

                                                                            However, though it may be falsely claimed that "despite the Founding
                                                                            Fathers not even trusting the then-States-appointed-Senate with
                                                                            originating Bills for Raising Revenue", they"mandated that the Senate
                                                                            try all impeachments"..held the final word on House/their-own
                                                                            officeholdings

                                                                            ...these A1S7P1-3,A2S4,A3S2P3&5TH AMENDMENT PROVISIONS (EXPLICITLY DETAILED IN USSTATUTE-1/24/1857)W/& W/OUT IMMUNITY AGREEMENTS,
                                                                            undeniably/beyond-doubt,allow the House to make local grand jury
                                                                            presentment(any local grand jury,for cause)obtain default-convictions&/or indictments

                                                                            ...&, certainly, where the Senate has expressed a criminal/judgment-disqualifying lack of impartiality, AS IN THE TRUMP MATTER, to allow the local grand jury (ies) to default-convict, we're possible, indict where possible, & the local trial jury to try the matter for conviction..

                                                                            Constitutionally, thereby, affording the Senate it's "try all impeachment authority", at the "Sentencing Trial Bifurcation Stage"..requiring a unanimous, beyond doubt, ruling-thereby to reverse or over-rule such a conviction..IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, AS CLEARLY JUSTIFIED HERE.

                                                                            After these GRAND JURY DETERMINATIONS ON LAW BY THE HOUSE (COMMITTEES), IT/THEY WILL BE READY TO PROCEED WITH ANY VOTES (AT THE LOCAL GRAND JURY/IES), IF NEEDED.....BUT, FIRST, MUST CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THAT DEFAULT-CONVICTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN
                                                                            OBTAINED IN THE MATTER

                                                                            ...specificly...www.AlreadyImpeached.blogspot.com &
                                                                            www.WeWon2020.blogspot.com (as done in 2016), as well as
                                                                            www.WeWon2018.blogspot.com​ (proving non-partisanship in the
                                                                            matters)...BE FOREWARNED: IF MR.TRUMP ENFORCED THESE
                                                                            COMMUNISM-ELIMINATING WARRANTS, BEFORE YOU DO,HE'LL WIN..

                                                                            The warranted Communist-sabotage-eliminating upgrades/correctives that
                                                                            accompanies the due-amounts warranted/obstructed therein include
                                                                            www.ScientificGrandJuryHandbook.blogspot.com & www.PRLog.Org/10439874,
                                                                            some obstructed since 1988-89's LADC#89-00443;USDC#90-2482;
                                                                            ET.SEQ...ENFORCE IMMEDIATELY!!!

                                                                            RCCFM, Always (c);

                                                                            Dr. Eric
                                                                            Dr. C. E. Durand (Williams-Durand)
                                                                            Who's Who in America Physician and Law Professor
                                                                            USN-1982; ROTC-1989-PRESENT
                                                                            [MOS: JAG & MEDICAL OFFICER*]
                                                                            [email protected]

                                                                            *Has World's Best Parochial Degrees and State Board Certifications,
                                                                            before entering the ROTC' s "DIRECT COMMISSION PROGRAM", etc..


                                                                            [IT'S THIS "STILL OCCURRING", COLONIAL BIFURCATION OF CIVIL & CRIMINAL "JURY TRIALS", REGARDING IMPEACHMENT/REMOVAL, SPECIFICLY, THAT CRIMINALLY FAILS/REFUSES TO MAKE HRAND JURY PRESENTMENTS AND REPORT/DECLARE CONSTITUTIONAL-DEFAULT-CONVICTIONS, WHEREVER POSSIBLE, THAT ALLOWS DEFAULT-CONVICTABLES/GUILTIES TO "GO FREE", AS SIMILARLY OCCURS IN PERMANENTLY-BIFURCATED-CRIMINAL-JURY-TRIALS, WHERE CIVIL & CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE ARE NOT INCLUDED/TRIED, ALLOWING THOSE "IMPEACHMENT CONVICTED", BY A 2/3RDS, BUT NOT UNANIMOUS, VOTE ON CRIMINAL GRAND/TRIAL JURY PROCEEDINGS TO "GO FREE", AS WELL...STILL CONSTITUTING "MOCK TRIALS"...THAT ALLOW THE GUILTY TO "GO FREE"/UNPUNISHED, AS WELL AS "PUNISHING THE INNOCENT"(VIA THE CIVIL-WAR-PRODUCTION/CRIME-&-DEBT EXAGGERATIONS OF DELAYS & INJUSTICE)..]

                                                                            • beauties halloffame
                                                                              beauties halloffame  2 weeks back

                                                                              Obviously/The-Point...

                                                                              • Duncan MacLennan
                                                                                Duncan MacLennan  2 weeks back

                                                                                THAT WAS PERFECT
                                                                                also.... #yang2020

                                                                                • Robert Hartford
                                                                                  Robert Hartford  2 weeks back

                                                                                  Biden facing corruption investigation.

                                                                                  • agikus
                                                                                    agikus  2 weeks back

                                                                                    why the extreme violation of our constitutional rights should land the corporate government in prison! better story!

                                                                                    • Dez H
                                                                                      Dez H  2 weeks back

                                                                                      The comment section has been paid for by Andrew Yang’s campaign.

                                                                                      Getting to my point, isn’t this an exchange - we’re using their service for free so they get to advertise?

                                                                                    • Mountain Whale
                                                                                      Mountain Whale  2 weeks back

                                                                                      Andrew Yang is the Ron Paul of 2020. Huge internet following, 0 electability.

                                                                                      • Harrzack
                                                                                        Harrzack  2 weeks back

                                                                                        Yang2020!

                                                                                        • b
                                                                                          b  2 weeks back

                                                                                          I don't want to be manipulated into buying. not even for money. I don't want to be a data protstitute.

                                                                                          • Lazy Aoba
                                                                                            Lazy Aoba  2 weeks back

                                                                                            Andrew Yang is the only one who can make this happen on his proposal. The use of data should be considered a property right.